SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Dixon BN, Hong YR, Perri MG, Allen A, Aufmuth J, Ross KM. J. Transp. Health 2022; 27: e101521.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.jth.2022.101521

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Introduction
The one-mile buffer is commonly used in examining associations between the built environment and weight-related outcomes; however, this buffer may not adequately capture access to built environment resources among individuals residing in geographically dispersed rural communities. Thus, there is need to explore how different buffer sizes and types capture access to built environment resources in rural communities.
Objective
This study compared two physical distance buffers (i.e., one-mile and two-mile) against two driving distances (i.e., 15-min and 30-min) to determine ability to capture access to built environment resources related to dietary intake and physical activity for participants in a weight management trial across rural counties.
Methods
Data from the Rural Lifestyle Eating and Activity (Rural LEAP) trial were combined with publicly available geospatial datasets to identify and examine built environment resources for individuals residing in 13 rural counties in Florida. Descriptive statistics were calculated to determine access to built environment resources, and paired samples t-tests were used to compare access across various buffers and by level of rurality.
Results
Results demonstrated limited resources available within the one- and two-mile buffers; however, participants had greater access to resources in the 15- and 30-min driving distances. Using supermarkets and grocery stores as an example, findings also demonstrated that participants residing in less rural counties compared to more rural counties had greater access to supermarkets and grocery stores within the 15-min (mean [SD] 9.16 [6.03], p < .0001) and 30-min (mean [SD] 24.82 [9.19], p = .007) driving distance buffers. There were no significant differences in the number of supermarkets between more or less rural counties for the one- and two-mile buffers.
Conclusion
Driving distances may be useful measures to capture access to built environment resources in rural communities. Future studies should examine alternative buffers that adequately capture built environment resources accessed by rural residents.


Language: en

Keywords

Built environment; Rural; Weight

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print