Citation

Kuperman AJ. Confl. Secur. Dev. 2022; 22(1): 47-77.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Kings College, Center for Defence Studies, Publisher Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/14678802.2022.2034367

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This article examines how the conflict since 2011 in Sudan's 'Two Areas', the states of South Kordofan and Blue Nile, has been prolonged by a well-intentioned but counter-productive international response. The United States and other western countries, motivated by humanitarianism, imposed sanctions against Sudan's regime and provided aid to rebel regions. This western response was fostered partially by disinformation - about the genesis of the conflict, the regime's use of force, and the causes and extent of the humanitarian crisis. Western support incentivized the rebels to perpetuate their hopeless military campaign, which prolonged the displacement of an estimated one-third of civilians in the Two Areas. Only after the United States lifted some sanctions in 2017, and a popular revolution overthrew the regime in 2019, did U.S. officials belatedly identify rebel leader Abdelaziz al-Hilu as an obstacle to peace. The article concludes with lessons for ending the conflict in Sudan's Two Areas and mitigating such civil wars elsewhere.

Language: en

Keywords

Blue Nile; civil war; humanitarian; intervention; moral hazard; rebellion; South Kordofan; Sudan