Citation

Fujikake K, Tanaka T, Yoshihara Y, Yonekawa T, Inagami M, Aoki H, Kanamori H. Trans. Soc. Automot. Eng. Jpn. 2019; 50(1): 134-141.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Society of Automotive Engineers of Japan)

DOI

10.11351/jsaeronbun.50.134

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

In this study, we used robot which was the most acceptable among ´voice´, ´vision´ and ´robot´ as a driver-agent. We verified whether the driving behavior improvement by driving the driving simulator together with the agent. The agent's support was 3 kinds of "driving-support", "feedback" and "driving support and feedback". Driving-support was real-time support by robot's voice. Feedback looked back on unsafe driving behaviors with movie after driving. Driving-support and feedback was combined use of both. As a result, driving behavior was improvement by using an agent. Driving behavior was the most improved condition was "driving-support and feedback". And, the condition with higher subjective evaluation was "driving-support and feedback".

Language: ja

Keywords

Safety; Driving support/driver support; Elderly driver; Agent