Citation

Lane FC. J. Econ. Hist. 1958; 18(4): 401-417.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1958, Economic History Association, Publisher Cambridge University Press)

DOI

10.1017/S0022050700107612

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

In The writing of economic history at present there is a tendency tofocus attention on the quantity of material goods and of people. This is not because economists seriously maintain that the chief end of man is to produce a maximum population, each member of which has at his disposal a maximum amount of material things. I do not think many economists or economic historians hold such a materialistic belief-why then would they choose to be professors ? We merely write as if we did, or at least we too often write so that we can be thus misinterpreted; and we are the more likely to be thus misinterpreted because the great political powers of the present, the United States and the Soviet Union, using different ideologies, each extols, paradoxically, its material productivity as proof of the force and validity of its ideals.

Language: en