Citation

Kratochwill TR, Horner RH, Levin JR, Machalicek W, Ferron J, Johnson A. J. Sch. Psychol. 2023; 97: 192-216.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2023, Society for the Study of School Psychology, Publisher Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.jsp.2022.12.002

PMID

36914365

Abstract

Single-case intervention research design standards have evolved considerably over the past decade. These standards serve the dual role of assisting in single-case design (SCD) intervention research methodology and as guidelines for literature syntheses within a particular research domain. In a recent article (Kratochwill et al., 2021), we argued for a need to clarify key features of these standards. In this article we offer additional recommendations for SCD research and synthesis standards that have been either underdeveloped or missing in the conduct of research and in literature syntheses. Our recommendations are organized into three categories: expanding design standards, expanding evidence standards, and expanding the applications and consistency of SCDs. The recommendations we advance are for consideration for future standards, research design training, and they are especially important to guide the reporting of SCD intervention investigations as they enter the literature-synthesis phase of evidence-based practice initiatives.

Language: en

Keywords

Humans; Design standards; *Behavior Therapy; *Research Design; Evidence criteria; Operational issues; Single-case research designs; Single-case standards