Citation

Wozniak KH, Pickett JT, Brown EK. Justice Q. 2022; 39(7): 1565-1591.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Publisher Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/07418825.2022.2111326

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This study explores whether Americans' punitiveness and perceptions of redeemability are shaped more by the type of crime committed or by judgements about an offender's moral character. Guided by theories of neoliberalism, we focus on laziness as an indicator of flawed character that is independent of criminality. A sentencing vignette experiment administered to a national sample of the U.S. population tested the effects of crime type and a defendant's employment status, work ethic, and race on respondents' preferred punishment and perceptions of the defendant's redeemability. Both crime type and work ethic significantly affect perceived (ir)redeemability and sentencing preferences, but the effects are not identical. Work ethic exerts the largest effect on perceived (ir)redeemability, whereas crime type most strongly influences sentencing preferences. We discuss the implications of our findings for act- vs. person-centered theories of punishment, as well as the role of laziness stigma in social responses to lawbreakers.

Language: en

Keywords

laziness; neoliberalism; Punitiveness; redeemability; vignette