SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Walsh CA, Struble CA, Aharonovich E, Shmulewitz D, Borodovsky J, Habib MI, Budney A, Livne O, Hasin DS. Drug Alcohol Depend. Rep. 2023; 7: e100161.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2023, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.dadr.2023.100161

PMID

37179574

PMCID

PMC10173391

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The diversity in characteristics of cannabis products and behavior patterns make evaluation of cannabis exposure in population-based, self-report surveys challenging. Accurate identification of cannabis exposure and related outcomes necessitates a thorough understanding of participants' interpretations of survey questions assessing cannabis consumption behaviors.

OBJECTIVES: The current study utilized cognitive interviewing to gain insight on participants' interpretation of items in a self-reported survey instrument used to estimate the quantity of THC consumed in population samples.

METHODS: Cognitive interviewing was used to evaluate survey items assessing cannabis use frequency, routes of administration, quantity, potency, and perceived "typical patterns" of use. Ten participants ≥18 years (n = 4 cisgender-men; n = 3 cisgender-women; n = 3 non-binary/transgender) who had used cannabis plant material or concentrates in the past week were recruited to take a self-administered questionnaire and subsequently answer a series of scripted probes regarding survey items.

RESULTS: While most items presented no issues with comprehension, participants identified several areas of ambiguity in question or response item wording or in visual cues included in the survey. Generally, participants with irregular use patterns (i.e., non-daily use) reported more difficulty recalling the time or quantity of cannabis use.

FINDINGS resulted in several changes to the updated survey, including updated reference images and new quantity/frequency of use items specific to the route of administration.

CONCLUSION: Incorporating cognitive interviewing into cannabis measurement development among a sample of knowledgeable cannabis consumers led to improvements in assessing cannabis exposure in population surveys, which may otherwise have been missed.


Language: en

Keywords

Marijuana; Cannabis; THC; Qualitative; Cognitive interviewing; Measurement assessment; Survey development

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print