SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Sartin EB, Lombardi LR, Metzger KB, Myers RK, Pfeiffer MR, Curry AE. J. Saf. Res. 2023; 85: 140-146.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2023, U.S. National Safety Council, Publisher Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.jsr.2023.01.013

PMID

37330863

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Examining crash reports with linked community-level indicators may optimize efforts aimed at improving traffic safety behaviors, like seat belt use. To examine this, quasi-induced exposure (QIE) methods and linked data were used to (a) estimate trip-level seat belt non-use of New Jersey (NJ) drivers and (b) determine the degree to which seat belt non-use is associated with community-level indicators of vulnerability.

METHOD: Driver-specific characteristics were identified from crash reports (age, sex, number of passengers, vehicle type) and licensing data (license status at the time of the crash). Geocoded residential addresses were leveraged within the NJ Safety and Health Outcomes warehouse to create quintiles of community-level vulnerability. QIE methods were applied to estimate trip-level prevalence of seat belt non-use in non-responsible, crash-involved drivers between 2010-2017 (n = 986,837). Generalized linear mixed models were then conducted to calculate adjusted prevalence ratios and 95 % confidence intervals for being unbelted for driver-specific variables and community-level indicators of vulnerability.

RESULTS: Drivers were unbelted during 1.2 % of trips. Males, those with suspended licenses, and those without passengers had higher rates of being unbelted than their counterparts. An increase was observed in traveling unbelted with increasing quintiles of vulnerability, such that drivers in the most vulnerable communities were 121 % more likely to be unbelted than those in the least vulnerable communities.

CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of driver seat belt non-use may be lower than previously estimated. Additionally, communities with the highest amount of the population living with three or more indicators of vulnerability have higher rates of seat belt non-use; this may be a particularly useful metric to inform future translational efforts improving seat belt use. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: As evidenced by the findings that risk of being unbelted increased as drivers' community vulnerability increased, novel communication efforts tailored to drivers from vulnerable neighborhoods may optimize efforts.


Language: en

Keywords

Humans; Motor vehicles; Male; Travel; New Jersey; Risk factors; *Accidents, Traffic; *Seat Belts; Community Resilience Estimates; Health behaviors; Linear Models; Traffic injury

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print