Citation

Wu Y, Hartman D, Wang Y, Goldfarb D, Goodman GS. Topics Cogn. Sci. 2023; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2023, Cognitive Science Society, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/tops.12667

PMID

37352442

Abstract

Self-reported lost memory of child sexual abuse (CSA) can be mistaken for "repressed memory." Based on our longitudinal studies of memory and disclosure in child maltreatment victims who are now adults, we discuss findings relevant to "repressed memory cases." We examined relations between self-report of temporarily lost memory of CSA (subjective forgetting) and memory accuracy for maltreatment-related experiences (objective memory). Across two studies involving separate samples, we find evidence for memory suppression rather than repression: (1) Most adults who claimed temporary lost memory of CSA reported memory suppression and clarified that they could have remembered the event if asked; (2) subjective forgetting was positively associated with accurate objective memory for maltreatment-related experiences. Subjective forgetting was also related to increased adult trauma symptoms and related to childhood non-disclosure of CSA. Moreover, trauma-related psychopathology mediated the relation between non-disclosure and subjective forgetting. Implications for psychological theory and repressed memory cases are discussed.

Language: en

Keywords

Adults; Child sexual abuse; Childhood trauma; Non-disclosure; Recovered memory; Repressed memory; Suppression