Citation

Sethi K, Bailey JS. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2023; 81(9): S111-S112.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2023, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.joms.2023.08.068

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to report on the etiology and epidemiology of maxillofacial fractures at a regional level I trauma center in central Illinois to better assist clinicians in diagnosis, prevention, and management. The epidemiology of maxillofacial fractures in urban level I trauma centers has been well-described in literature. Erdmann et al found that at Duke Medical Center the most common etiologies of facial fractures came from assault (36%) and motor vehicle collision (MVC, 32%).1 Similarly, Halsey et al at also found the most common etiologies as assault (44.9%) and MVC (14.9%), with gunshot wounds being 6%.2 However, the characteristics of maxillofacial fractures in rural areas have not been as well-studied. During our literature review, only 1 paper describing the etiology of facial fractures in a rural American setting was identified.3 Smith et al reviewed cases of facial fractures that presented to their Midwestern level I trauma center over the period of 2008 to 2009 with a sample size of 154 patients.3 They found that 99% of the facial fractures in their data set were caused by blunt trauma; motor vehicle crash (MVC) being most common (47%), followed by falls (25%), and assault (12%). A retrospective chart review was conducted utilizing records from rural, community-based regional tertiary referral center. Data was collected over a 5-year period from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019. All patients who presented to our emergency department were directly admitted or transferred to our institution with a new diagnosis of a radiologically confirmed facial fracture were included. There were no records that were excluded. Patient demographics, type of fracture, and mechanism of injury were collected. A chi-squared analysis was used to determine statistical significance between select variables. A P-value <.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 1,935 patients were diagnosed with a facial fracture over this time period, which were all included in our review. The mean age was 38.71 ± 23.87. The most common mechanism of injury was fall (37.94%), followed by assault (31.03%) and motor vehicle collision (13.54%). Women were more likely to report a facial fracture associated with a fall versus all other mechanisms compared to men (P <.05). The most common fracture was of nasal bones (30.32%). The mechanism of injuries causing facial trauma were further classified based for type of fracture (Table 1) and age (Table 2). In conclusion, the etiology of facial trauma at a rural level I trauma center differs from an urban setting. Falls were the most common etiology of a facial fracture at the rural hospital, whereas literature has shown that assault and MVC were the most common etiologies of facial fractures at urban hospitals. Additionally, the most common facial fractures reported differed between our study and documented studies at urban trauma centers. Orbital, mandible, and maxillary fractures were represented to be the most common at urban centers, compared to our study which showed the burden of facial fractures to be concentrated to the nasal bones, orbit, and mandible. Understanding the etiology and patterns of facial trauma allows for prevention, diagnosis, and development of resident education.

Language: en