Citation

Fox ES, McDonnell JM, Wall J, Darwish S, Healy D, Butler JS. Surgeon 2023; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2023, Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland)

DOI

10.1016/j.surge.2023.09.005

PMID

37802706

Abstract

Alternative metrics, or altmetrics, have emerged as a promising tool for measuring the social impact of research, which is increasingly important in today's digital and social media-driven world. Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) is a weighted count of all the online attention garnered by a study, and it is currently unclear whether a relationship with traditional bibliometrics exists. The purpose of this article was to retrospectively review articles published in the Surgeon Journal from 2003 to 2020 to compare AAS with bibliometric parameters using an Independent t-test and Pearson's correlation analysis. There were statistically significant weakly positive relationships between AAS and sample size, number of reads, and number of citations. There was no statistically significant relationship between AAS and number of authors, H-index, or level of evidence. This study highlights the potential value of altmetrics by measuring the social impact of research as altmetrics can provide valuable information not captured by traditional metrics. It is currently unclear what the optimal balance of social and academic impact is in evaluating research impact and how altmetrics can be integrated into existing research frameworks.

Language: en

Keywords

Bibliometrics; Almetrics; Citations; Reads; Research impact