SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Wu Y, Mo J, Sui L, Zhang J, Hu W, Zhang C, Wang Y, Liu C, Zhao B, Wang X, Zhang K, Xie X. Front. Neurosci. 2021; 15.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, Frontiers Research Foundation)

DOI

10.3389/fnins.2021.655412

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has shown promising outcomes as new therapeutic opportunities for patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) who do not respond adequately to several consecutive treatments. This study aims to systematically review and conduct a meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of DBS for TRD.

METHOD: The literature was comprehensively reviewed using Medline, Google scholar, Cochrane library, Embase, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform until January 2019. The studied outcomes included response, remission, recurrence, and adverse events (AEs) rates, and were reported as the rate ratio (RR) or pooled estimate with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Heterogeneity was measured by an I-square test and a sensitive analysis.

RESULTS: A total of 17 studies involving 7 DBS targets were included. For efficacy, DBS treatment was statistically beneficial for TRD, and the response, remission, and recurrence rates were 56% (ranging from 43 to 69%), 35% (ranging from 27 to 44%), and 14% (ranging from 4 to 25%), respectively. However, only two randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) considered the invalidity of DBS (RR = 1.45, 95% CI = 0.50-4.21). For safety, the AEs rate was 67% (ranging from 54 to 80%). The AEs were common and moderate, but the problems related to suicide and suicidal ideation should not be underestimated.

CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that DBS for TRD is considered promising, which should be confirmed by well-designed and large sample studies. Future basic research and comprehensive clinical trials are needed to reach better understanding on the mechanisms of action and optimal targeted structure. © Copyright © 2021 Wu, Mo, Sui, Zhang, Hu, Zhang, Wang, Liu, Zhao, Wang, Zhang and Xie.


Language: en

Keywords

human; suicide; systematic review; Review; suicidal ideation; patient safety; major depressive disorder; suicide attempt; recurrent disease; meta analysis; recurrence risk; remission; treatment response; brain depth stimulation; clinical effectiveness; treatment resistant depression; clinical outcome; deep brain stimulation; treatment-resistant depression; adverse event; nerve nuclei; psychiatric surgery

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print