SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
Email Signup | RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Weiss HB, Ismailov RM, Lawrence BA, Miller TR. Inj. Prev. 2004; 10(2): 119-121.

Affiliation

Center for Injury Research and Control, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA. hw@injurycontrol.com

Copyright

(Copyright © 2004, BMJ Publishing Group)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

15066979

PMCID

PMC1730069

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since 1997, hospital discharge data have included external cause of injury (E codes) for designating perpetrator relationship in assaults. For intentional injuries, guidelines require using two E codes; one for the injury mechanism and another (E967.n) identifying perpetrator relationship. Completeness and characteristics of the use of these codes have not been studied on a multistate level among states with complete E coding. METHODS: Hospital discharge data for 1997 were solicited from states with good E coding completeness. Data were received from 19 states (51.9% of women in the United States, ages 15-49). For assaulted women, a regression model was constructed to identify factors associated with perpetrator code assignment using age, payment source, pregnancy status, race, and severity as covariates. RESULTS: Among 137 887 injured hospitalized women age 15-49, there were 7402 assaults (5.4%). Among all assaults to women, perpetrator coding was poor (8.8%). Among those that were perpetrator coded, 83.7% were spouse/partner related. Age was positively associated with probability of having a perpetrator code (p<0.001). Those paid by a private source were 42.9% more likely to have a perpetrator code (p = 0.007). Pregnant women were seven times more likely to have a perpetrator code (p < 0.001). Non-white women were 66.8% less likely to have a perpetrator code (p < 0.001) than white women. CONCLUSIONS: The poor use of perpetrator codes in hospital discharge data minimizes their usefulness for surveillance of serious injury from intimate partner violence. An implication of this research is the need to understand the gaps and strengthen the completeness of perpetrator documentation and coding. The findings suggest caution when interpreting the results from existing hospital discharge data based intimate partner violence surveillance systems.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print