We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
Email Signup | RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article


Andersen LB, Lawlor D, Cooper A, Froberg K, Anderssen S. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2009; 19(3): 406-411.


(Copyright © 2009, John Wiley and Sons)






In many Western countries, there are concerns about declining levels of physical activity in school‐aged children. Active transport is one way to increase physical activity in children, but few studies have evaluated whether active transport in school‐aged children and adolescents has beneficial effects on fitness and, if so, whether different modes of transport affect different aspects of fitness. In this study, we examined the association of active transport with different aspects of fitness in a representative Danish sample of 545 boys and 704 girls, 15–19 years of age. Physical fitness was assessed through a number of field tests, including a maximal cycle test, dynamic and static strength in different muscle groups, muscle endurance, flexibility and agility. Transport to school was reported as the mode of transport. Almost two‐thirds of the population cycled to school. Cyclists had higher aerobic power than both walkers and passive travelers (4.6–5.9%). Isometric muscle endurance (10–16%), dynamic muscle endurance in the abdominal muscles (10%) and flexibility (6%) were also higher in cyclists compared with walkers and passive travelers. Mode of travel was not related to leisure‐time sports participation. Our findings suggest that commuter bicycling may be a way to improve health in adolescents.


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley