We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
Email Signup | RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article


Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn T, Bilo RAC, van Duurling LL, Karst WA, Maaskant JM, van Aalderen WM, van Rijn RR. Acta Paediatr. 2013; 102(11): e497-501.


Section of Forensic Pediatrics, Department of Forensic Medicine, Netherlands Forensic Institute, the Hague, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center/Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.


(Copyright © 2013, John Wiley and Sons)






AIM: We investigated the prevalence of risk factors for and the prevalence of prior abuse in abusive head trauma victims in the Netherlands. METHODS: We performed a retrospective file review of all abusive head trauma cases in the Netherlands in which forensic medical expertise was requested by the courts, between 2005 and 2010. Outcome measures were risk factors and indicators for prior abuse. RESULTS: Eighty-nine cases were included; 62% boys, median age 3.5 months. Impact trauma was found in 48% of cases, with a male perpetrator in 79%. Prematurity, dysmaturity and twins/triplets were found in 27%, 23% and 10% of cases respectively, maternal age under 20 years in 17%. Of the parents, 60% had completed only primary or secondary education 38% of the families were known to child welfare authorities. There was evidence for prior abuse in 81% of the cases. CONCLUSION: The high number of families with prior abuse indicates that both the health care system and child welfare authorities failed to protect some of the children that have been in their care. Our results highlight the importance of training health care and child welfare professionals in recognizing physical abuse, as well as the importance of optimizing abusive head trauma prevention strategies. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Language: en


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley