SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
Email Signup | RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

N Gerber C, Carcreff L, Paraschiv-Ionescu A, Armand S, J Newman C. Ann. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2019; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Affiliation

Paediatric Neurology and Neurorehabilitation Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Lausanne University Hospital, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland. Electronic address: christopher.newman@chuv.ch.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.rehab.2019.02.003

PMID

30978529

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of objective and reliable tools to measure walking performance in children with cerebral palsy (CP).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability of inertial measurement units (IMUs) measuring daily-life walking performance and physical activity (PA) in children with CP and healthy controls.

METHODS: Algorithms were developed to analyse data collected with IMUs during 2 standard school days of the same week and 1 weekend day in 15 children with CP and 14 controls. Additionally, within a clinical trial, 10 children with CP were measured twice, on the same weekday 2 to 4 weeks apart. Relative and absolute reliabilities of PA (% time walking, standing, sitting/lying) and gait parameters (e.g., velocity, cadence) were evaluated by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and minimal detectable change (MDC95), comparing 2 school days of the same week, a school day with a weekend day, and the same weekday 2 to 4 weeks apart.

RESULTS: For the 15 children with CP (mean [SD] age 13.5 [3.4] years), ICCs were very high (0.70-0.98) when comparing gait parameters for 2 school days. ICCs were lower when comparing 2 school days for 14 control children (mean [SD] age 13.9 [3.0] years) and lowest when comparing a school day with a weekend day for both CP and control children. ICCs for PA were 0.90-0.91 when measuring the same weekday 2 to 4 weeks apart but were very low when comparing 2 school days of the same week or a school day with a weekend day. MDC95 values were high for both groups and all comparisons but comparable with findings of in-lab studies of similar parameters.

CONCLUSIONS: Our IMU and algorithm setup appears to be a reliable tool to measure daily life gait parameters in children with CP when repeatedly measured on 2 school days. PA was also reliably assessed but when measuring the same school day some weeks apart. However, the high MDC95 values question whether the setup can be used as a responsive outcome measure of interventions.

Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.


Language: en

Keywords

Cerebral Palsy; Gait; Performance; Physical Activity; Reliability; Sensor

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print