Citation

Cremeens J, Eiser C, Blades M. J. Pediatr. Psychol. 2007; 32(2): 132-138.

Affiliation

Division of Behavioral Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 332 North Lauderdale, Mail Stop No. 740, Memphis, Tennessee 38105-2794, USA. joanne.cremeens@stjude.org

Copyright

(Copyright © 2007, Oxford University Press)

DOI

10.1093/jpepsy/jsj119

PMID

16625022

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of age, scale, and item type on the reliability and reproducibility of children's quality-of-life (QOL) responses. METHODS: The TedQL (ability, social, and mood items) was administered to 266 healthy children (age range of 5-6 and 7-9 years) at two time points, comparing three rating scales (circles, faces, and thermometer). Children were given the same (n = 144) or different (n = 122) scales over time. RESULTS: Reliability for total QOL and ability items was highest for circles and for social items using the faces. Faces and thermometer scales showed highest reproducibility over time. Greater agreement over time across different scales was found between circles and faces (5-6 years) and thermometer and circles (7-9 years). CONCLUSIONS: For maximum internal reliability, circles are recommended for ability items and faces for social items. For maximum reproducibility over time, the thermometer is recommended for 5-6 years and faces for 7-9 years.

Language: en