SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Pickett W, Brison RJ, Berg RL, Zentner J, Linneman J, Marlenga BL. Inj. Prev. 2005; 11(1): 6-11.

Affiliation

Department of Emergency Medicine and Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2005, BMJ Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1136/ip.2004.005769

PMID

15691981

PMCID

PMC1730186

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe pediatric farm injuries experienced by children who were not engaged in farm work, but were injured by a farm work hazard and to identify priorities for primary prevention. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from a novel evaluation of an injury control resource using a retrospective case series. DATA SOURCES: Fatal, hospitalized, and restricted activity farm injuries from Canada and the United States. SUBJECTS: Three hundred and seventy known non-work childhood injuries from a larger case series of 934 injury events covering the full spectrum of pediatric farm injuries. METHODS: Recurrent injury patterns were described by child demographics, external cause of injury, and associated child activities. Factors contributing to pediatric farm injury were described. New priorities for primary prevention were identified. RESULTS: The children involved were mainly resident members of farm families and 233/370 (63.0%) of the children were under the age of 7 years. Leading mechanisms of injury varied by data source but included: bystander and passenger runovers (fatalities); drowning (fatalities); machinery entanglements (hospitalizations); falls from heights (hospitalizations); and animal trauma (hospitalizations, restricted activity injuries). Common activities leading to injury included playing in the worksite (all data sources); being a bystander to or extra rider on farm machinery (all data sources); recreational horseback riding (restricted activity injuries). Five priorities for prevention programs are proposed. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial proportions of pediatric farm injuries are experienced by children who are not engaged in farm work. These injuries occur because farm children are often exposed to an occupational worksite with known hazards. Study findings could lead to more refined and focused pediatric farm injury prevention initiatives.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print