Citation

Braunstein ML, Hoffman DD, Shapiro LR, Andersen GJ, Bennett BM. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1987; 13(3): 335-343.

Affiliation

School of Social Sciences, University of California, Irvine 92717.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1987, American Psychological Association)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

2958582

Abstract

Mathematical analyses of motion perception have established minimum combinations of points and distinct views that are sufficient to recover three-dimensional (3D) structure from two-dimensional (2D) images, using such regularities as rigid motion, fixed axis of rotation, and constant angular velocity. To determine whether human subjects could recover 3D information at these theoretical levels, we presented subjects with pairs of displays and asked them to determine whether they represented the same or different 3D structures. Number of points was varied between two and five; number of views was varied between two and six; and the motion was fixed axis with constant angular velocity, fixed axis with variable velocity, or variable axis with variable velocity. Accuracy increased with views, decreased with points, and was greater with fixed-axis motion. Subjects performed above chance levels even when motion was eliminated, indicating that they exploited regularities in addition to those in the theoretical analyses.

Language: en