Citation

Andersen GJ. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1989; 15(2): 363-371.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Champaign 61820.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1989, American Psychological Association)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

2525603

Abstract

A common assumption in several analyses of optic flow is that the velocity field must be locally smooth in order to recover relative depth and the structure of surfaces in the environment. This study investigated the appropriateness of this constraint to human perception. In the first experiment, subjects were asked to identify the number of planes present in a display simulating one, two, three, four, or five overlapping, transparent planes. Subjects were able to detect the presence of up to three planes accurately for both horizontal and depth translations. In the second experiment, subjects' judgments of the depth separation of two transparent, overlapping planes increased with the simulated separation. In Experiment 3, subjects were able to determine accurately the sign of depth for two overlapping, transparent surfaces. These results suggest that a smoothness constraint is not required for the analysis of optic flow by human observers. Alternative approaches to the analysis of optic flow are discussed.

Language: en