Citation

Conte HR, Karasu TB. Am. J. Psychother. 1990; 44(2): 232-246.

Affiliation

Department of Psychiatry, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1990, Association for the Advancement of Psychotherapy)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

2195902

Abstract

This paper gives a capsule review of the major issues on the subject of malpractice for individual practitioners of psychotherapy. It examines the elements necessary to support a malpractice claim and presents examples of cases in specific areas of liability. Historically, the field of psychotherapeutic malpractice was largely inactive. However, recent court rulings reveal that psychotherapists are no longer immune to malpractice suits. In decreasing order of the likelihood of the plantiffs being successful in their suits are cases involving the misuse of the therapeutic relationship, breach of confidentiality, and cases that involve prevention of harm to third parties and to patients themselves. Malpractice suits based on negligence in providing appropriate treatment are beginning to emerge and will probably increase in frequency as the efficacy of biological treatment is demonstrated. Available solutions to the problems of malpractice are discussed. It is suggested that in addition to the existing external sanctions, there is a need for consultation plus educational programs to enhance our ability to practice within the boundaries that the courts have set for us.

Language: en