Citation

Pfister BJ, Chickola L, Smith DH. Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 2009; 30(4): 339-345.

Affiliation

Department of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ; Corporate Engineer, Six Flags Theme Parks, Inc., Jackson, NJ; and Center for Brain Injury & Repair and the Department of Neurosurgery.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2009, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins)

DOI

10.1097/PAF.0b013e318187e0c9

PMID

19901817

PMCID

PMC2796436

Abstract

The risk of traumatic brain injury (TBI) while riding roller coasters has received substantial attention. Case reports of TBI around the time of riding roller coasters have led many medical professionals to assert that the high gravitational forces (G-forces) induced by roller coasters pose a significant TBI risk. Head injury research, however, has shown that G-forces alone cannot predict TBI. Established head injury criterions and procedures were employed to compare the potential of TBI between daily activities and roller coaster riding. Three-dimensional head motions were measured during 3 different roller coaster rides, a pillow fight, and car crash simulations. Data was analyzed and compared with published data, using similar analyses of head motions. An 8.05 m/s car crash lead to the largest head injury criterion measure of 28.1 and head impact power of 3.41, over 6 times larger than the roller coaster rides of 4.1 and 0.36. Notably, the linear and rotational components of head acceleration during roller coaster rides were milder than those induced by many common activities. As such, there appears to be an extremely low risk of TBI due to the head motions induced by roller coaster rides.

Language: en