Citation

Batniji R, Van Ommeren M, Saraceno B. Soc. Sci. Med. 2005; 62(8): 1853-1864.

Affiliation

World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2005, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.050

PMID

16202495

Abstract

Increasingly, social scientists are interested in mental and social health conduct qualitative research to chronicle the experiences of and humanitarian responses to disaster. We reviewed the qualitative social science research literature in relation to a significant policy document, the Sphere Handbook, which includes a minimum standard in disaster response addressing "mental and social aspects of health", involving 12 interventions indicators. The reviewed literature in general supports the relevance of the Sphere social health intervention indicators. However, social scientists' chronicles of the diversity and complexity of communities and responses to disaster illustrate that these social interventions cannot be assumed helpful in all settings and times. With respect to Sphere mental health intervention indicators, the research largely ignores the existence and well-being of persons with pre-existing, severe mental disorders in disasters, whose well-being is addressed by the relevant Sphere standard. Instead, many social scientists focus on and question the relevance of posttraumatic stress disorder-focused interventions, which are common after some disasters and which are not specifically covered by the Sphere standard. Overall, social scientists appear to call for a social response that more actively engages the political, social, and economic causes of suffering, and that recognizes the social complexities and flux that accompany disaster. By relating social science research to the Sphere standard for mental and social health, this review informs and illustrates the standard and identifies areas of needed research.