SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Farley JF. Med. Care. 2010; 48(5): 440-447.

Affiliation

From the Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2010, American Public Health Association, Publisher Lippincott Williams and Wilkins)

DOI

10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181d502bd

PMID

20351586

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:: In 2002, the Mississippi Division of Medicaid enacted several policies to curb prescription spending including increasing prescription copayments from $1 to $3 per brand, a cap of 7 prescriptions per month, a 34-day supply limitation, and a 5% reduction in dispensing fees. The objectives of this study were to examine the influence of these policies on (1) compliance to antipsychotic medications and (2) mental health care utilization and payments among patients with schizophrenia. METHODS:: This study used a 12-month pretest and 12-month posttest longitudinal design to compare the effect of these policies among patients with schizophrenia in Minnesota and Indiana, who had less restrictive cost-containment using administrative claims data. Generalized estimating equations were used to run difference in difference models to compare medication compliance (proportion of days covered) and health care utilization in Mississippi to the control states. RESULTS:: After policy adoption, patients in Mississippi were 4.87% less compliant with antipsychotic treatments and experienced 20.5% more 90 day antipsychotic treatment gaps than patients in the control states. Although these policies did not affect inpatient or emergency department care among patients with schizophrenia, there was a 3.7% reduction in outpatient mental health visits and a 4.2% reduction in mental health care payments. CONCLUSIONS:: Despite the potential for savings, policy makers should consider carefully the potential adverse consequences that may arise from implementing aggressive cost-containment policies among patient with severe mental illness.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print