Citation

Dennis RJ, Finch CF, Farhart PJ. Br. J. Sports Med. 2005; 39(11): 843-6; discussion 843-6.

Affiliation

University of New South Wales, NSW Injury Risk Management Research Centre, Sydney, Australia. rebecca.dennis@unsw.edu.au

Copyright

(Copyright © 2005, BMJ Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1136/bjsm.2005.018515

PMID

16244195

PMCID

PMC1725068

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether bowling workload is a risk factor for overuse injury to Australian junior cricket fast bowlers and to evaluate the appropriateness of current bowling workload guidelines. METHODS: Forty four male fast bowlers (mean (standard deviation) age 14.7 (1.4) years) were monitored prospectively over the 2002-2003 season. Bowlers completed a daily diary to record bowling workloads and self reported injuries, which were validated by a physiotherapist. Bowling workload prior to the first injury (for those bowlers who were injured) was compared to workload across the whole season for uninjured bowlers. RESULTS: Eleven (25%) bowlers reported an overuse-type injury, with seven of these sustaining a back injury. Injured bowlers had been bowling significantly more frequently than uninjured bowlers (median number of days since the previous bowling day: 3.2 v 3.9 days, Mann-Whitney U = 105.0, p = 0.038). Compared with bowlers with an average of > or =3.5 rest days between bowling, bowlers with an average of <3.5 rest days were at a significantly increased risk of injury (risk ratio (RR) = 3.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1 to 8.9). There were also trends towards an increased risk of injury for those who bowled an average of > or =2.5 days per week (RR = 2.5, 95% CI 0.9 to 7.4) or > or =50 deliveries per day (RR = 2.0, 95% CI 0.7 to 5.4). CONCLUSIONS: This study has identified high bowling workload as a risk factor for overuse injury to junior fast bowlers. Continued research is required to provide scientific evidence for bowling workload guidelines that are age-specific for junior fast bowlers.