Citation

Johnstone AJ, Lohlun JC, Miller JD, McIntosh CA, Gregori A, Brown R, Jones PA, Anderson SI, Tocher JL. Brain Inj. 1993; 7(6): 501-506.

Affiliation

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1993, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

8260953

Abstract

The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and the Swedish Reaction Level Scale (RLS85), two level-of-consciousness scales used in the assessment of patients with head injury, were compared in a prospective study of 239 patients admitted to a regional head injury unit over a 4-month period. Assessments were made by nine staff members ranging from house officer to registrar, after briefing about the two scales. Data were also collected on age, nature of injuries, surgical treatment, and condition at discharge or transfer using the Glasgow Outcome Scale. Both the GCS and the RLS85 reliably identified comatose patients and those with minor head injury, but were much less effective in defining the response level in patients considered to have a moderate head injury. Only 41% of the patients allocated to a moderate-head-injury category by the GCS and the RLS85 were common to both groups. Where a mismatch occurred, neither scale allocated patients to a 'better' or 'worse' category more frequently than the other. Assessment of patients' conscious levels using the GCS was difficult in only two cases. One patient had facial injuries, and the other was intubated. The RLS85 was reported by all users to be simpler to use than the GCS, but the latter is much more widespread in use. Both scales function well in cases of severe and minor head injury, but have weaknesses when defining moderate head injury. Level-of-consciousness scales are only an aid to assessment and the final choice between the two scales must remain a matter of personal or departmental preference.

Language: en