SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Francis B, Soothill K, Dittrich R. Br. J. Criminol. 2001; 41(4): 726-737.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2001, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, Publisher Oxford University Press)

DOI

10.1093/bjc/41.4.726

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The non-consequentialist approach to punishment sentences on the basis of offence-seriousness. However, there has been little theoretical or empirical consideration of the notion of offence-seriousness. Identification of serious' offences tends to be commonsensical at best. Further, there is currently no systematic way of measuring changes of seriousness over time. This study is a demonstration project displaying a way to investigate how the judiciary and the magistracy rank offence-seriousness in assessing actual cases. The use of paired-comparisons methodology provides a procedure which overcomes some problems of previous approaches. The method enables an assessment of the performance of judges and magistrates in terms of how they view the seriousness of offences without the artificiality of being involved in hypothesized field experiments.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print