Citation

Croce R, Horvat M, Roswal G. Percept. Mot. Skills 1996; 82(2): 507-514.

Affiliation

Department of Kinesiology, New Hampshire Hall, University of New Hampshire, Durham 03824-3559, USA. rvc@christa.unh.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 1996, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

8724923

Abstract

Coincident timing by individuals who exhibit traumatic brain injury was measured under conditions of no knowledge of results (no KR; n = 12), KR on every trial (n = 14), summary KR (n = 13), and average KR (n = 12). Following acquisition trials, groups performed immediate and longer retention trials without KR. Absolute constant error and variable error, analyzed in separate repeated-measures analyses of variance, indicated that during acquisition trials subjects receiving KR on every trial were the most accurate and the most consistent in their responses; however, subjects in groups receiving summary and average KR were the most accurate during immediate retention, with the group receiving summary KR being the most accurate during longer retention.

Language: en