Citation

Kilpatrick NM, Scott J, Robinson S. Int. J. Paediatr. Dent. 1999; 9(3): 153-159.

Affiliation

Department of Paediatric Dentistry, University of Sydney, Westmead Hospital Dental Clinical School, Australia.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1999, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

10815571

Abstract

AIM: To establish the experience and knowledge of dental practitioners in New South Wales, Australia in the area of child abuse and protection. DESIGN: A cross-sectional telephone questionnaire. SAMPLE: One hundred and twenty-two interviews; 67 general dental practitioners randomly selected and 55 members of the Australia and New Zealand Society of Paediatric Dentistry. RESULTS: All of the dentists interviewed could identify physical abuse and most identified emotional abuse, however, none could describe all five forms of abuse. Significantly more (58%) members of the paediatric dental society had at some time suspected abuse, compared with only 24% of the general practitioners. However, only 20 of the paediatric dentists and seven general practitioners had actually reported any cases. The main reason given for not reporting concerned confidentiality. Seventy-two per cent of general practitioners did not know their legal obligations or with whom they could discuss any concerns. While paediatric dentists achieved a better percentage, still over half of them were similarly unsure. CONCLUSIONS: Further education and training is required for both the dental profession and the child protection agencies to improve the inter-agency working relationship and thus provide better protection for children.

Language: en