Citation

Fointiat V, Morisot V, Pakuszewski M. Psychol. Rep. 2008; 103(2): 625-633.

Affiliation

Laboratory of Social Psychology, University of Provence, Aix-en-Provence, France. Valerie.Fointiat@univ-provence.fr

Copyright

(Copyright © 2008, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

19102490

Abstract

Hypocrisy can be considered as a dissonance state expressed as a combination of two factors: commitment (advocating a pronormative position) and mindfulness (being aware of past transgressions). Such inconsistency between what people advocate and their past behaviors is usually reduced by modifying behaviors or behavioral intentions in line with normative advocacy. The aim of this study is to examine the conditions under which this set of behaviors (apparent hypocrisy) can occur. Specifically, the salience of the transgressions was manipulated: participants were led to recall 1 or 4 transgressions varying in severity (serious vs harmless). As expected, recalling 4 transgressions led to greater behavioral change than recalling only 1 transgression. Surprisingly, recalling 4 harmless transgressions induced greater behavioral change than recalling 4 serious transgressions.

Language: en