SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Fisher BD, Richardson S, Hosler AS. Am. J. Health Promot. 2010; 25(2): 134-137.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2010, SAGE Publications)

DOI

10.4278/ajhp.081218-ARB-311

PMID

21039295

Abstract

Purpose. To test inter-rater reliability and internal consistency of a reduced-item version of an environmental audit tool for physical-activity resources in a rural setting. Design. A cross-sectional design. Setting. Five rural school districts in western New York. Participants. A random sample of 391 street segments (i.e., the length of a street contained within a census block.) Fifty street segments were observed a second time for a reliability analysis. Measure. The Pedestrian Environmental Data Scan (PEDS), a previously tested instrument for conducting audits of the built environment for physical-activity supports, was used. Modifications were made for use in rural settings. Analysis. Four tests of reliability (Kappa [κ]; prevalence-adjusted, bias-adjusted κ [PABAK]; percent agreement; and Spearman rho [ρ]) and one test of internal consistency (Cronbach α) were used. Results. Nineteen measures were identified for their utility in the rural setting. These measures had an average κ of .43, an average PABAK of .72, and an average percent agreement of 86.2%, indicating good agreement. They were organized into four subscale areas that had Spearman ρ ranging from moderate (ρ  =  .38) to strong (ρ  =  .66). Alpha (α) values for the scale overall (α  =  .60) and subscales (range, .25-.66) suggested that items included were likely to be multi-dimensional. Conclusion. A simpler audit tool has been identified that might be more appropriate for use in the rural setting.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print