Citation

Forbes D, Fletcher S, Lockwood E, O'Donnell M, Creamer MC, Bryant RA, McFarlane AC, Silove D. J. Affect. Disord. 2011; 130(3): 483-486.

Affiliation

Australian Centre for Posttraumatic Mental Health and Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.jad.2010.10.032

PMID

21071095

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The proposed DSM-V criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) specifically require both active avoidance and emotional numbing symptoms for a diagnosis. In DSM-IV, since both are included in the same cluster, active avoidance is not essential. Numbing symptoms overlap with depression, which may result in spurious comorbidity or overdiagnosis of PTSD. This paper investigated the impact of requiring both active avoidance and emotional numbing on the rates of PTSD diagnosis and comorbidity with depression. METHOD: We investigated PTSD and depression in 835 traumatic injury survivors at 3 and 12months post-injury. We used the DSM-IV criteria but explored the potential impact of DSM-IV and DSM-V approaches to avoidance and numbing using comparison of proportion analyses. RESULTS: The DSM-V requirement of both active avoidance and emotional numbing resulted in significant reductions in PTSD caseness compared with DSM-IV of 22% and 26% respectively at 3 and 12months posttrauma. By 12months, the rates of comorbid PTSD in those with depression were significantly lower (44% vs. 34%) using the new criteria, primarily due to the lack of avoidance symptoms. CONCLUSION: These preliminary data suggest that requiring both active avoidance and numbing as separate clusters offers a useful refinement of the PTSD diagnosis. Requiring active avoidance may help to define the unique aspects of PTSD and reduce spurious diagnoses of PTSD in those with depression.

Language: en