Citation

Dalrymple J, Appleby J. Br. Med. J. BMJ 2000; 320(7227): 94-97.

Affiliation

Schools of Health, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ. j.dalrymple@uea.ac.uk

Copyright

(Copyright © 2000, BMJ Publishing Group)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

10625265

PMCID

PMC27257

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Comparison of reporting of recent epileptic seizures by patients to a doctor and anonymously. DESIGN: Cross sectional study of patients with epilepsy by comparison of paired questionnaires. SETTING: Rural and urban general practices in Norfolk. PARTICIPANTS: 122 patients aged over 16 years and able to self complete a questionnaire who were recruited by 31 general practitioners when attending for review of their epilepsy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The difference in reported occurrence of seizure to general practitioners and in a linked anonymous questionnaire. RESULTS: 18 patients failed to report a seizure in the past year to their general practitioner (uncontrolled epilepsy). 40% (24/60) of people with epilepsy who anonymously reported a seizure in the past year held a driving licence, but only six revealed this to their general practitioner. The unemployment rate was 34%, substantially higher than the 9% in the general population. Measures of anxiety, depression, and stigmatization were higher in patients with uncontrolled epilepsy. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients with epilepsy under-report their seizures. Recognition of underreporting is important if patients are to benefit from adequate and appropriate treatment. General practitioners' ability to treat epilepsy is hampered by their role in regulating the rights of epileptic patients to hold a driving licence or access certain occupations.

Language: en