SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Searles JS, Helzer JE, Rose GL, Badger GJ. J. Stud. Alcohol 2002; 63(3): 352-362.

Affiliation

Department of Psychiatry, Health Behavior Research Center, University of Vermont, South Burlington 05403, USA. john.searles@vtmednet.org

Copyright

(Copyright © 2002, Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

12086136

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare near-concurrent and retrospective reports of alcohol consumption and to determine whether a simple adjustment function could be applied to the retrospective reports to correct any distortions in reporting. METHOD: Reports of daily alcohol consumption collected via an Interactive Voice Response (IVR) system were aggregated over 30, 90 and 366 days and compared with the corresponding retrospective reports gathered with the Timeline Follow Back (TLFB). Comparisons of the IVR and TLFB reports for five consumption variables were made for each time period for 33 men. RESULTS: Significant differences between reporting methods were found for four of the five variables tested. On average, the TLFB yielded an underestimate of alcohol consumption compared to the IVR. This underestimate associated with TLFB reports was not dependent on the length of the recall period. Regression analyses indicated that the relationship between the two modalities of reporting was dependent on the quantity of drinks reported, thus precluding the application of a simple, linear metric to the TLFB data to model near real-time daily data obtained through the IVR more accurately. CONCLUSIONS: The retrospective TLFB consistently and significantly underestimated alcohol consumption compared to the aggregated daily reports. This underestimate, however, was stable across the three reporting periods. With one exception, no simple linear function could be applied to the retrospective TLFB consumption reports to more accurately reflect the IVR data gathered daily. Evidence presented here also suggests that underreporting on the TLFB is not simply a matter of consciously attempting to conceal consumption.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print