SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Preece R. Proc. Int. Counc. Alcohol Drugs Traffic Safety Conf. 1995; 1995: 30-35.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1995, The author(s) and the Council, Publisher International Council on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Research was conducted in New South Wales during 1994 to determine the attitudes, knowledge and experience of licensed premises with regard to public breath testing devices. A three stage research method was used, involving in-depth discussions with managers/owners, the development of a draft questionnaire which was then piloted, and finally a survey of 144 managers/owners of premises. The results show that the experience of managers/owners of premises with public breath testing devices is that they are accurate (80 percent), have no negative effect upon alcohol sales (93 percent) and are a service for their patrons (26 percent) which assists them in determining whether to drive (49 percent). Managers/owners of premises without devices were generally positive toward them (54 percent) and see them as fairly accurate (53 percent). While there are minor issues which need to be addressed, such as improved servicing and providing information on the accuracy of devices, the results indicate that there is opportunity to broaden the availability of public breath testing devices.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print