SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Gubala W, Zuba D, Piekoszewski W. Proc. Int. Counc. Alcohol Drugs Traffic Safety Conf. 2002; 2002: 1123-1127.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2002, The author(s) and the Council, Publisher International Council on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

A group of 38 volunteers participated in 74 experiments with multiple collection of blood and saliva samples and simultaneous breath testing. BAC/BrAC, BAC/SAC and SAC/BrAC ratios were calculated for every sampling time for each examined person in each experiment. It gave 975 values of the distribution ratio of ethanol for each system. The mean values of BAC/BrAC ratio calculated for absorption and elimination phases differed significantly (1822.1+/-315.9 and 2330.9+/-384.7, respectively, t=19.0, p<0.001). BAC/BrAC ratio slightly grows with increase of ethanol concentration in absorption phase (BAC/BrAC = 1583+/-60 + 466+/-110 x BAC, r=0.26, p<0.001) and with fall of ethanol concentration during elimination (BAC/BrAC = 2758+/-40 - 836+/-75 x BAC, r=-0.39, p<0.001). The difference in BAC/SAC ratio in both phases was also statistically significant (832+/-0.152 and 1.037+/-0.157, t=18.1, p<0.001). SAC/BrAC ratio did not show any dependency on the phase (2217.6 +/- 384.6 and 2264.3 +/- 357.4, t=1.81, p>0.05). Both in the absorption and elimination phase the SAC/BrAC ratio value felt with alcohol concentration (absorption: SAC/BrAC = 2572+/-66 - 595+/-104 x BrAC, r=-0.34, p<0.001; elimination SAC/BrAC = 2514 +/- 33 - 517+/-64 x BrAC, r=-0.29, p<0.001).

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print