Citation

Kreindler SA. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 2005; 9(2): 90-107.

Affiliation

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford. adisara@shaw.ca

Copyright

(Copyright © 2005, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_1

PMID

15869377

Abstract

The study of right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and Social Dominance Orientation (SDO) as predictors of prejudice has represented an attempt to explain group dynamics in terms of individual traits. In contrast, I argue that the individual tendencies that predict prejudice are actually a product of group dynamics. This article critiques personality approaches, focusing primarily on authoritarianism and secondarily on social dominance, and defends a model that explains the 2 variables in terms of discrete group processes. According to the Dual Group Processes model, SDO reflects category differentiation, which involves the evaluation of individuals on the basis of their category membership. RWA reflects normative differentiation, which involves the evaluation of ingroup members on the basis of their prototypicality. Authoritarian aggression-whether against ethnic minorities or other targets-is conceptualized as an intragroup phenomenon, involving the rejection of perceived antinorm deviants who threaten the longevity or legitimacy of social norms.

Language: en