SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Raber E, Hirabayashi JM, Mancieri SP, Jin AL, Folks KJ, Carlsen TM, Estacio P. Risk Anal. 2002; 22(2): 195-202.

Affiliation

Environmental Protection Department, University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, CA 94551, USA. Raber1@llnl.gov

Copyright

(Copyright © 2002, Society for Risk Analysis, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

12022670

Abstract

In the event of a terrorist attack or catastrophic release involving potential chemical and/or biological warfare agents, decisionmakers will need to make timely and informed choices about whether, or how, to respond. The objective of this article is to provide a decision framework to specify initial and follow-up actions, including possible decontamination, and to address long-term health and environmental issues. This decision framework consists of four phases, beginning with the identification of an incident and ending with verification that cleanup and remediation criteria have been met. The flowchart takes into account both differences and similarities among potential agents or toxins at key points in the decision-making process. Risk evaluation and communication of information to the public must be done throughout the process to ensure a successful effort.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print