Citation

Barratt ES, Stanford MS, Dowdy L, Liebman MJ, Kent TA. Psychiatry Res. 1999; 86(2): 163-173.

Affiliation

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77555-0443, USA. ebarratt@utmb.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 1999, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

10397418

Abstract

Although aggression research in general has been hampered by a lack of objective measurements of aggressive acts, two types of aggressive acts, impulsive vs. premeditated, have been studied extensively in recent years. These two types of aggression have been primarily measured by structured or semi-structured interviews. The current study was designed to assess the construct validity of these two types of aggression using a self-report questionnaire which included items gleaned from the content of interviews used in past studies. For this study, 216 college students assessed their own aggressive acts rather than answering general questions about aggression. The students were not significantly different from normative sample groups on self-report measures of impulsiveness, aggression, and anger/hostility. A PCA factor analysis with a promax rotation of the items on the self-report questionnaire identified four factors: impulsive aggression; mood on the day the act occurred; premeditated aggression; and agitation. Thus, impulsive and premeditated aggression are independent constructs which exist in varying degrees among these 'normal' persons in a non-clinical sample. Impulsive aggression was characterized in part by feelings of remorse following the acts and by thought confusion. Premeditated aggression was related to social gain and dominance.

Language: en