CONTACT US: Contact info
|
Citation |
Stafford CT. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1996; 77(2): 87-95. |
|
Affiliation |
Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, USA. |
|
Copyright |
(Copyright © 1996, American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology, Publisher Elsevier Publishing) |
|
DOI |
|
PMID |
8760773 |
|
Abstract |
LEARNING OBJECTIVES: Reading this article will reinforce the reader's knowledge of the taxonomy, origin, and distribution of fire ants and will increase his ability to diagnose and manage reactions caused by the two imported species, Solenopsis invicta and richteri. This review will also enhance the reader's knowledge of the available diagnostic methods and therapeutic measures, including the role of fire ant venom versus whole body extract in the management of fire ant allergy. DATA SOURCES: Information for this review was obtained primarily from abstracts and articles written by investigators recognized for their expertise in fire ant venom research. STUDY SELECTION: References were selected based on their clinical applicability and relevance to the epidemiology and pathophysiology of imported fire ant hypersensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: The imported fire ant represents a significant health hazard for persons living in fire ant endemic areas in the southern United States. Sting reactions range from local pustules and large, late-phase responses to life-threatening anaphylaxis. Fire ant allergen-specific immunotherapy can reduce the risk of subsequent systemic reactions. Four important Sol i venom allergens have been isolated and characterized. Clinical studies have been designed to compare the safety and efficacy of fire ant venom with whole body extract for diagnosis and treatment of fire ant allergy. Language: en |