Citation

Cook-Darzens S, Mann EM. Child Abuse Negl. 1981; 5(1): 33-43.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1981, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Many Child Protective agencies in the United States have guidelines for referring certain kinds of abuse/neglect cases for psychiatric-psychological assessments which leave up to the referring agent such decisions as: choice of assessor (psychiatrist, psychologist, other), purpose of evaluation, and part of the family system to be evaluated. In order to develop a more systematic approach to comprehensive evaluations of abusive families, the referral process from the Hawaii Child Protective Services Agency to a child guidance center was analyzed through chart review, and its influence on the outcome of psychiatric-psychological assessments was examined. Evaluations by psychiatrists were also compared with those of psychologists. The results showed that the great majority of the cases referred for assessment were victim-children and that recommendations paralleled this trend by being child rather than adult or family oriented. In addition, referral questions and resulting recommendations centered more on diagnosis than on issues of intervention (treatment, placement, legal needs), suggesting an underutilization of the assessors' clinical skills. Differences between psychiatrists and psychologists are also reported. These findings point to a need for greater commitment to family pathology. Implications for developing more effective referral guidelines and for training are discussed.