Citation

Gordon E, Reeves ER. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2011; 130(4): 2435.

Affiliation

USAARL, Acoust. Branch, 6901 Farrel Rd., P.O. Box 620577, Fort Rucker, AL 36362-0577, elmaree.gordon@us.army.mil.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2011, American Institute of Physics)

DOI

10.1121/1.3654764

PMID

21973941

Abstract

Hearing loss is one of the most common occupational injuries in the Department of Defense. One reason is limited access to adequate hearing protection during combat operations. Even if traditional pre-formed foam earplugs are used during combat, approximately 15% of the military population remains unprotected because the pre-formed earplugs do not adequately fit extremely small ear canals, extremely large ear canals, or ear canals with sharp turns. Custom-fit earplugs provide a potential solution for this hard-to-fit population. However, producing traditional wax-dipped custom-fit earplugs in a combat environment is not always practical. Fortunately, methodology exists to scan ear impressions to create a digital data set, transmit this data to a remote manufacturer via the Internet, and fabricate a set of custom-fit earplugs. The purpose of this study was to investigate how the attenuation provided by custom-fit earplugs created using the digital scanning technique compares to the attenuation provided by custom-fit earplugs created using the traditional wax-dipped technique when used with the CEP. Results show the digitally scanned custom-fit earplugs provide significantly poorer attenuation than the traditional wax-dipped custom-fit earplugs. Comply Canal Tip foam earplugs were also evaluated and shown to provide significantly greater attenuation than custom-fit earplugs manufactured by either method.

Language: en