SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Peterson D, Currey N, Collings S. Psychiatr. Rehabil. J. 2011; 35(2): 145-147.

Affiliation

Social Psychiatry & Population Mental Health Research Unit School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2011, Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Boston University)

DOI

10.2975/35.2.2011.145.147

PMID

22020846

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe the pressures surrounding disclosure of a mental illness in the New Zealand workplace. Methods: Using qualitative methods and general inductive analysis, the study included twenty-two employed New Zealanders with experience of mental illnesses. Results: Fear of discrimination, and legal, practical and moral pressures contributed to tension between workplace disclosure and non-disclosure of a mental illness. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: The decision to disclose a mental illness is a dilemma throughout the employment process, not just a problem for the beginning of an employment relationship. Employees with experience of mental illnesses and their employers need to be able to access advice throughout this process on disclosure issues. Disclosure is irreversible; therefore, the decision to disclose, and its timing, must remain at the discretion of the employee.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print