Citation

Schneider E, Jahn K, Dieterich M, Brandt T, Strupp M. Exp. Brain Res. 2008; 185(1): 21-26.

Affiliation

Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Munich - Grosshadern Ludwig-Maximilians University, Marchioninistr. 23, 81377, Munich, Germany. eschneider@nefo.med.uni-muenchen.de

Copyright

(Copyright © 2008, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/s00221-007-1134-6

PMID

17909767

Abstract

Locomotion control uses proprioceptive, visual, and vestibular signals. The vestibular contribution has been analyzed previously with galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS), which constitutes mainly a virtual head-fixed rotation in the roll plane that causes polarity-specific deviations of gait. In this study we examined whether a visual disturbance has similar effects on gait when it acts in the same direction as GVS, i.e., when roll vection is induced by head-fixed visual roll motion stimulation. Random dot patterns were constantly rotated in roll at +/-15 degrees /s on a computer-driven binocular head-mounted display that was worn by eight healthy participants. Their gait trajectories were tracked while they walked a distance of 6 m. A stimulation effect was observed only for the first three to four steps, but not for the whole walking distance. These results are similar to the results of previous GVS studies, suggesting that in terms of the direction of action visual motion stimulations in the roll plane are similar to GVS. Both kinds of stimulation cause only initial balance responses in the roll plane but do not contribute to the steering of gait in the yaw plane.

Language: en