Citation

Cameron ID, Rebbeck TJ, Sindhusake D, Rubin G, Feyer AM, Walsh J, Schofield WN. Spine 2008; 33(3): 250-254.

Affiliation

Rehabilitation Studies Unit, University of Sydney, Ryde NSW, Australia. ianc@mail.usyd.edu.au

Copyright

(Copyright © 2008, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins)

DOI

10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816244ed

PMID

18199964

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Interrupted time series. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a change in legislation improved health status and quality of life for people with whiplash. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Whiplash was the most prevalent injury in a compulsory, fault based, third party motor vehicle insurance scheme in New South Wales, Australia. Legislative change removed financial compensation for "pain and suffering" for whiplash, introduced clinical practice guidelines for its treatment; and changed regulations to permit earlier acceptance of compensation claims, and earlier access to treatment, for all types of injury. METHODS: Three independent groups of people with whiplash were identified from insurance data (before legislative change--the 1999 group and, after legislative change--the 2001 and 2003 groups). Health status was assessed 2 years after injury by a telephone interviewer blinded to the study hypotheses. The main outcome measure was disability, as assessed by the Functional Rating Index (FRI). Pain and health-related quality of life was also assessed. RESULTS: The mean FRI at 2 years after injury was 38.0% (SE, 1.9) for the 1999 group, 31.8% (SE, 2.1) for the 2001 group, and 30.1% (SE, 1.8) for the 2003 group (F = 5.0, P = 0.007). Improvement in secondary outcomes, including pain, also occurred. CONCLUSION: Health status of people with whiplash improved after legislative change. Design of compensation schemes should be undertaken with the understanding that the scheme structure may have substantial effects on the long-term health of injured people.

Language: en