SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Allard-Dansereau C, Haley N, Hamane M, Bernard-Bonnin AC. Child Abuse Negl. 1997; 21(10): 965-974.

Affiliation

Department of Pediatrics, University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1997, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

9330797

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine whether sexual victimization of children by young aggressors differs from adult aggressors. METHOD: A case review was performed on medical records of children less than 12 years of age referred in 1992 to the Child Protection Clinic at a tertiary care pediatric hospital. RESULTS: Medical evaluation for sexual abuse was carried out on 316 children, 79% girls, 21% boys, mean age 6 +/- 2.7 years. Among known perpetrators, 39 were less than 16 years and 15 were between 16 and 19 years old. Young aggressors were more likely to abuse older female victims (p = .0009). They also were reported to engage in more genital/genital and genital/anal acts (p < .001). The aggressor's young age was found to be an important determinant related to a history of penetrative forms of sexual abuse (OR = 4.015, 95% C.I. 2.0581; 7.8319). Genital examination was specific for abuse (Adam's Class IV or V) in only 6.3% of victims, but significantly more often when the perpetrator was between 16-19 years old (p = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Adolescent aggressors appear to engage in more genital/genital and genital/anal sexual abuse than older aggressors. Victims of aggressors age 16 to 19 had a higher risk of having specific findings on the anal/genital examination.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print