Citation

Tombu M, Jolicoeur P. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2003; 29(1): 3-18.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2003, American Psychological Association)

DOI

10.1037/0096-1523.29.1.3

PMID

12669744

Abstract

The authors present the central capacity sharing (CCS) model and derive equations describing its behaviors to explain results from dual-task situations. The predictions of the CCS model are contrasted with those of the central bottleneck model. The CCS model predicts all of the hallmark effects of the psychological refractory period (PRP) pardigm: -1 slope of the PRP effect at short stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs), underadditivity of precentral Task 2 manipulations, additivity of central or postcentral Task 2 manipulations with SOA, and carry forward to Task 2 of Task 1 precentral or central manipulations at short SOAs. The CCS model also predicts that Task 1 response times increase with decreasing SOA. The model is a viable alternative to the central bottleneck model.