Citation

Smith LB, Thelen E, Titzer R, McLin D. Psychol. Rev. 1999; 106(2): 235-260.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington 47405, USA. smith4@indiana.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 1999, American Psychological Association)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

10378013

Abstract

The A-not-B error is one of the most robust and highly studied phenomena in developmental psychology. The traditional Piagetian interpretation is that the error reflects the immaturity of infants' understanding of objects as permanent entities. More recently, the error has been interpreted in terms of changes in representation, in memory, in spatial knowledge, and in inhibitory processes. Each account may be partially right but none offers a unified account of the many accumulated facts about this error. This article presents and tests a new unified explanation. The authors propose that the perseverative reach back to A is the product of the processes that take a hand to a location in visual space: the body-centered nature of the spatial code, memories for previous reaching activity, and the close coupling of looking and reaching. The results from 6 experiments support this explanation. The results are used to challenge the idea of knowledge independent of and distinct from behavior.

Language: en