Citation

Vishton PM, Rea JG, Cutting JE, Nuñez LN. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1999; 25(6): 1659-1672.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, Amherst College. peter.vishton@dartmouth.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 1999, American Psychological Association)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

10641314

Abstract

The discovery that the prehension component of an open-loop, two-fingered reach is largely immune to certain salient pictorial illusions has been used to suggest that humans possess 2 distinct visual systems, 1 that subserves perceptual judgment and 1 that mediates visually controlled action. In this article, the authors present evidence that suggests that the critical distinction is not that of reaching and judgment but of relative and absolute perception. Experiment 1 extends the findings of S. Aglioti, J. F. X. DeSouza, and M. A. Goodale (1995) and suggests that the manual prehension component of open-loop reaching is affected by the horizontal-vertical illusion to a much smaller degree than perceptual size judgments. In Experiments 2 and 3, however, when perceptual size judgment is directed at a single element of the display, this difference vanishes. Experiment 4 demonstrates that grip scaling is strongly affected by the illusion when a single reach is scaled to both the horizontal and vertical components of a triangular figure.

Language: en