SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Rüsseler J, Hennighausen E, Münte TF, Rösler F. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 2003; 15(2): 116-126.

Affiliation

Department of Neuropsychology, Institut für Psychologie II, Otto-von-Guericke University, Postfach 4120, 39016 Magdeburg, Germany. jascha.ruesseler@nat.uni-magdeburg.de

Copyright

(Copyright © 2003, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

12429364

Abstract

The present study investigated differences in sequential learning between subjects who were or were not informed of the presence of a repeating sequence (intentional or incidental group, respectively). Subjects had to learn a 16-letter-long repeating sequence that was irregularly disrupted by deviating stimuli. Reaction times indicated that both groups learned the sequential regularities. Intentional learners showed a larger learning effect. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) recorded during performance of the task showed a reliably enhanced amplitude for the N2b- and P3b-components for deviant letters for intentional learners, but not for incidental learners. These results are discussed in the context of models proposing that different neural structures are involved in implicit and explicit serial learning.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print